 | | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2 —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) I agree with you, but the advantage of the 'virtual folder' approach is that it would continue to work with LDraw, without any weird sub-directory references needed in multi-file models. Which brings me back to my original idea of having LDAO (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2 —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | (...) Hey Steve! That is *exactly* what I was thinking! (and I can't think of anytime when you said it, so if you did, I must've missed it.) That would be the way I'd like it done. I think it would make a cleaner directory tree. Jeff P.S. I hope you (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2 —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) When LDAO starts moving (temporary) files in and out of ldraw\models, what should it do about the files already there? And what if the user launches model1\main.dat into LEdit, but then opens model2\main.dat into l3p? (...) In the File Save (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2 —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | (...) No, File/New Model File. I don't usually change the names of files while working on them (I always do it outside of the programs), so I've never encountered any other problems like this. Jeff (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2 —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) OK. I've added code for that specific case. I will review the other file commands, and make sure they have protection as well. Steve (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
