 | | Re: LDraw and the Track Designer (Was: Next show)
|
|
(...) Duh, yes. 11.25 is just wishful thinking. Never mind. Well one teeny downside to your switch proposal is the new geometries that would result. worth it though, to be free from the tyranny the current geometry imposes. (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Still getting cad.dev through e-mail
|
|
Todd, Last week, I unsubscribed myself from all the groups in favor of getting them via nntp. The e-mail subscription page indicates that I am not subscribed to any groups now. However, I still seem to be getting lugnet.cad.dev by e-mail. What can I (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw and the Track Designer (Was: Next show)
|
|
(...) No, curves are 22.5 degrees. If you give Track Designer bitmaps at 0, 22.5, 45 and 67.5 degrees it can generate all the other possible rotations. However, the existing registry only has track at all these rotations, road plates, monorail[1] (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: castle parts
|
|
(...) Most of these are on my todo list, esp. helmet, torsos and saddle, but I've resisted bagging them on the parts tracker until I actually start work. There are several non-modelled helmets - do you mean the one with the vertical bars across the (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
(...) Since Japan uses y-d-m, then the TLA month would be better. Steve (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Uber-install (was Re: Organizing the Site Revamp)
|
|
(...) Yep. I'm still (when I have time) playing with this in Wise. Steve (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Uber-install (was Re: Organizing the Site Revamp)
|
|
By the way I took a look of what takes that much space in ldao and it happens that it is mostly the vb6 virtual machine and the comctl.ocx. Since those are already correctly installed in the system of all those who used the previous install you (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
(...) Yes Japan does, However since it is always confusing when numbered dates are used I would suggest 1999-jan-01 which is unmistakable. (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw and the Track Designer (Was: Next show)
|
|
(...) I forgot to say that Magenta was the color I picked to be the "transparent" color because I did not use any magenta or anything remotely close to Magenta, in my bitmap image. This may well be a "MS Paint" thing, I forget where I was working at (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw and the Track Designer (Was: Next show)
|
|
(...) Oops. Forgot the bit about the viewpoint. That can be passed to LDraw as well. It's the -a parameter. Steve (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw and the Track Designer (Was: Next show)
|
|
(...) But rotations in 22.5 degree increments would be better, of course, and 11.25 might even be best, as we are then at the resolution of a curve segment, no? Since that requires rather complex calculations, it's more natural to have a rendering (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | castle parts
|
|
has anyone made these parts? minifig torso with black falcon flag 2 x 2 with black falcon castle shield with black falcon castle wall corner with scattered stones pattern spear longbow arrow quivver horse saddle knights helment with fixed face grill (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Further discussion on ldraw.org
|
|
Ok, everyone, I'm this close > < to getting the ring site done and uploaded... and so that means that I will start design sketches on the graphic part of the site which I will complete before HTML coding. Does anyone have further thoughts or issues (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <36c978b2.2064646@lu...et.com>... (...) I think I'll table that question for now and work on developing a version of the old element. It appears that the element in LDRAW is of the newer type. Once we have that we'll (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw and the Track Designer (Was: Next show)
|
|
(...) Yep. Pass in a .DAT filename, and include the -MS parameter (for Mode Save). A bitmap will be created in the ldraw\bitmaps directory. It will have the same filename. If there are step commands in the DAT file, several bitmaps will be created, (...) (26 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Primitives HTML Guide
|
|
(...) Thanks Jacob, I had wondered where it went. I've updated it with new primitives since July, so will eMail you separately. I'm not sure what amendments you made, but if they're not in my new version , please let me know. Chris (26 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw and the Track Designer (Was: Next show)
|
|
(...) I'm not too familiar with LDraw, can I call it with a design (.DAT file) and a viewpoint and get back a bitmap somehow? Matt (26 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw and the Track Designer (Was: Next show)
|
|
(...) A stand-alone utility could call LDraw (or LDLite) to produce the images, but extract the (port) information directly from the .DAT file. Calling into LDraw/LDLite is pretty easy -- both programs are command-line driven. The utility would have (...) (26 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw and the Track Designer (Was: Next show)
|
|
(...) Track Designer can already automatically rotate [1] and scale any new bitmap that you give it. I'm not sure why you would want to do this in an image editor? What are the weird artifacts that you are referring to when using magenta as the (...) (26 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw and the Track Designer (Was: Next show)
|
|
This sounds like an excellent idea, however I'm not sure how to implement it. If it were a built in feature of Track Designer it would require that the entire rendering engine of LDraw be built into TD. A bit daunting! If it were built into LDraw, (...) (26 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
