 | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea —Benoit Cerrina
|
| | | (...) Yes Japan does, However since it is always confusing when numbered dates are used I would suggest 1999-jan-01 which is unmistakable. (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) Since Japan uses y-d-m, then the TLA month would be better. Steve (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | | Benoit: (...) I have always believed that Japan uses a year-month-day date format. Are you sure? Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- LDraw FAQ: <URL:(URL) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea —Karim Nassar
|
| | | | | | (...) I can speak on this. Japan uses either y-d-m or d-m-y in modern forms. Traditionally (and still in some traditional circles) the Year is expressed in reference to the current ruling emperor, so the year that I was there (1996) was actually (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea —Benoit Cerrina
|
| | | | | | You are both right I actually meant that, since the date expressed in the example (ISO) was year month day I wasn't carefull enough when I read the other message. I don't know of a country which uses year day month. By the way I so what your talking (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea —Benoit Cerrina
|
| | | | Sorry cancel that I didn't read it carefully enough Japan uses Year Month Day Benoit a écrit dans le message ... (...) are (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
