 | | Re: Status of SW Ion Cannon?
|
|
(...) I believe the newest L3P is totally up-to-date on primitive substitutions, but the previous did not substitute all cones. BTW, which cones did you use? I meas-timated the radii as 5 and 9, so the existing conic primitives don't fit very well. (...) (26 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig torso subpart (was suggestion for roadplate like parts)
|
|
(...) And I will take care of the back-sides as well. Chris, is it OK with you if I finish the detailing of the two torsos (dungarees and BT2, I think) that reference 9326.dat, instead of 9326-4t.dat? They both need to have the undecorated surface (...) (26 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
|
(...) I know it is, and I thought I already knew your answer. I just wanted to let you know I wasn't trying to be pushy, or expect something for nothing. Steve (26 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig torso subpart (was suggestion for roadplate like parts)
|
|
(...) Chris, Steve Bliss has volunteered to do all the labor. :-) -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 18-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig torso subpart (was suggestion for roadplate like parts)
|
|
(...) Yes, I agree, but this will mean more work to change the existing decorated torsos - adding three extra quads as well as changing the call to 9326-4t.dat and changing that subpart. I can do this, but it will take a little time - is that OK? (...) (26 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
