 | | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) I don't need the part, I just remember it was a part that came up during a discussion on whether part-variations were important or not. (...) To be perfectly serious, for this part, I'd copy the existing 4081.dat and modify it. The only change (...) (26 years ago, 15-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <3715f8f5.7183451@lu...et.com>... (...) In this case, the difference can make a world of difference. (...) and (...) Again, Steve, I'm sorry when I wrote the above my mind was thinking about the problems I'm having (...) (26 years ago, 16-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Abuse (was: Re: Non-TLG Parts)
|
| (...) jw is being abused not because his parts stink, but because his attitude does. If someone else performed exactly the same actions jw has, but more appropriate language, they wouldn't be abused at all. Steve (26 years ago, 16-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Abuse (was: Re: Non-TLG Parts)
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <3717595d.1405512@lu...et.com>... (...) Normally I would agree, but the situation has gotten to the point where I can't tell which side of the question is worse. JW certainly comes off as rough around the edges, but his (...) (26 years ago, 16-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
