 | | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy —Steve Bliss
| | | | (...) Yep, that's pretty much where I'm at. Especially since I use my newsreader for scanning the groups, and I hop over to the web interface specifically to look at the postings in lugnet.cad.dat. Other than mixing DAT's with discussion, I'm pretty (...) (26 years ago, 15-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy —Jonathan Wilson
| | | | | | here is what i think we should have under lugnet.cad: lucnet.cad. leave as is. lugnet.cad.dev. create new groups: lugnet.cad.dev.parts for discussions related to parts and parts making. lugnet.cad.dev.page for discussions related to ldraw.org (both (...) (26 years ago, 15-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy —Todd Lehman
| | | | | (...) Whenever you'd like. If you think it would help you focus, or help collect LDAO ideas, thoughts, and issues together, or give people a more open forum to talk about LDAO, (or all of the above), then it's yours for the asking. Here is some data (...) (26 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) I know it is, and I thought I already knew your answer. I just wanted to let you know I wasn't trying to be pushy, or expect something for nothing. Steve (26 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
