 | | [ldraw.org] L3P Question
|
|
Ahhh.... Well, I tried messing with some l3p stuff this morning to generate an image for ldraw.org I would like to use. I would like a red 2x3 brick with the -q3 level with 'Lego' on the studs. I can't get the right camera angle for l3p or in the (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Eve of Beginnings
|
|
(...) :) But I will work towards getting the best plan I believe will work at this point.. :\ (...) Ok, that is what I need to know. Also, I believe it would be appropriate to seek their permission either through this list or email (depending if (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
|
(Repost, to fix a lugnetter ID problem I was having yesterday. :-) (...) (I knew I said that I'd stay out of this, but argh argh argh argh fooey.) I like Jacob's suggestion, for him to volunteer to mentor Johnathan for a month on a trial basis. (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDAO - Temp Location
|
|
(...) You're welcome. Three things to be aware of in this release: 1. The VEC opens really slowly the first time you access it in any session of LDAO. This is because ldraw\parts is being checked to make sure there aren't any part-files newer than (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
|
(...) No, 5LDU is not accurate enough, especially for studs. Regular studs are always spaced *exactly* 20LDU apart. The only exceptions are some very odd, small bits. Depending on the part, studs will either be positioned on the even-number (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P support of extended metacommands?
|
|
(...) Cool! Thanks. :) (...) Yep, the 'fixed' version of the 1x1 cone looks much better now. (...) When do you expect that you will be able to release this as a 'real version'? Steve (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Dimensions of the parts
|
|
(...) That wouldn't work all the time. Imagine that you have 2 parts at the exact same location, if I allow a small margin the program would think that they are not touching each other. (...) That's the only solution I found so far, couldn't think (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts DESPERATLY wanted (steve: please read)
|
|
(...) Apparently not. (...) That's not the one I did. (...) There were at least a couple of different accessory packs like this. Steve (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
|
i am listening to the group. i will do everything i can to accually get some lego to work from. at the monent i have a bag of lego (not mine) that i am looking at, but all the parts that guy had that were not in ldraw are too hard IMHO to model e.g. (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: L3P support of extended metacommands?
|
|
(...) I think that this someone was me! I made the TRANSLATE/ROTATE/SCA.../TRANSFORM support two month ago, but have been very busy at work since then. I need further testing of other new features and the perpetual doc writing. But here you have a (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
