 | | Dat posting idea for users of Agent
|
|
I just had a good idea for simplifying posting of .dat files to cad.dat. - at least for users of Forte's Agent. Maybe this could work for other newsreaders? As most of you are aware, when posting .dat files you should increase your line length in (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Dat posting idea for users of Agent
|
|
(...) I guess it would work for any newsreader that doesn't allow a newsgroup- by-newsgroup line-length setting and does allow multiple installations. (...) Pretty slick, yup. :-) But pretty perverse too. :-) I was thinking of at some point (after I (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Dat posting idea for users of Agent
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... <snip> (...) This would be quite inconvenient, especially for times when web access is limited. -John Van (25 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Dat posting idea for users of Agent
|
|
(...) Arghh! You mean to undermine my perverse, er, clever idea! Yeah, I guess if it would make everything works smoother, that would be OK. But you could still reply to cad.dat posts from a newsreader, right? Cause I don't really care for using the (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Dat posting idea for users of Agent
|
|
(...) I agree. Perhaps this is one spot where MIME attachments make sense. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Dat posting idea for users of Agent
|
|
(...) Yea, fer sure. The only reason would be to standardize/correct posting problems. --Todd (25 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Dat posting idea for users of Agent
|
|
(...) Good idea, yes! If not in the storage, at least in the acceptance of the messages. --Todd (25 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
