 | | Testing long filenames was Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)? —Timothy Gould
|
| | | (...) And sorry to reply to myself... Could people using older operating systems test this? I'm happy to maintain the status quo if there are problems but if no-one finds problems then I think we make the majority suffer for something that isn't (...) (18 years ago, 1-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Testing long filenames was Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)? —Tore Eriksson
|
| | | | (...) Well, I made a small program in Delphi 7 that lists the command line parameters, drag and dropped a file named "LongFileName.dat" in it, and here is the surprising result: (URL) (Running on a Win98SE PC.) So I think long file names still has (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Testing long filenames was Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) (URL) Here's> the output on XP. ROSCO (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Testing long filenames was Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)? —Tore Eriksson
|
| | | | | | (...) Thanks, Well well, first advantage of downgrading to XP, I guess. Just to be sure, you did drag and drop into the "application", or did you write it in a command line? /Tore (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Testing long filenames was Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | (...) That was command line, (URL) the result with drag n drop> is similar. ROSCO (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Testing long filenames was Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)? —Travis Cobbs
|
| | | | | (...) My best guess is at that time MS was trying to make things safe for old programs (although it seems senseless for them to have done this with Win32 apps). If you call the Win32 function GetLongPathName on the short path, it will give you the (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | I hereby accect long file names! —Tore Eriksson
|
| | | | | | (...) It's an utterly complicated way, but it works! Only problem is that GetLongPathName erases all other kinds of command line parameters. Now that I know that at least it is possible to avoid shortened pathnames, I rest my case. I no longer (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Testing long filenames was Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)? —Willy Tschager
|
| | | | | (...) (URL) on Win2000 SP4 w. (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Testing long filenames was Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)? —Manfred Moolhuysen
|
| | | | (...) showing D:DownloadsShowParameters.exe The second line (Label2) however, stays blank. With friendly greetings, M. Moolhuysen. (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| | | | |
