 | | Re: Restart of LDA2001 Project (using LDraw models - L3P - POV)
|
|
(...) That is what I was going to do too. (...) I guess what I was thinking was exporting a file that could either be povray format, a format that l3p could convert (preserving unions, macros, etc), or a format that I would use with Anton's library (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.animation, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Restart of LDA2001 Project (using LDraw models - L3P - POV)
|
|
(...) Thanks for the response. Just a qiuck reply, got to go back to work... LDA outputs both .dat files for the indiviual frames but also one master .dat that has references to the single-frame files, separated by CLEAR and STEP. L3P supports (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.animation, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Restart of LDA2001 Project (using LDraw models - L3P - POV)
|
|
(...) Tore, I think I know what you could do that would meet even my needs. Here is my idea. Output one pov-ray file. Have it export valid pov-ray format using unions, macros, clocks, switches, ranges, etc. Then, with that, it will be easy to add (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.animation, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Affirmation
|
|
Hi all, Thanks for all the words of support regarding the LDraw.org Contributer Agreement. We've received quite a few responses but would like to wrap up this issue as quickly as possible. For those who haven't heard of the CA here's the (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
(...) many, many thx to the LSC for getting the job done so quickly :-)))) w. (URL) (20 years ago, 9-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Very small triangle and a quad that thinks its a tri
|
|
(...) I'll send you the whole file (its not complete yet), but the values for the tri are A (0.989107, -1, 0) B (0.997785, -0.98677, 0.06652) C (0.997785, -1, 0.06652) William (20 years ago, 8-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: *** SPAM *** Re: Very small triangle and a quad that thinks its a tri
|
|
(...) Only at 5dp (ie -det/-dist of 0.00001), but then as the values are only to 5dp this is not surprising! The co-linear vertices are reported for any -det/dist values from 1 to 0.00001 William (20 years ago, 8-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Very small triangle and a quad that thinks its a tri
|
|
(...) I think so too. William, could you please e-mail me the actual coordinates of A, B, etc., and perhaps the whole file. (...) Good question! (...) The colinearity test currently has a hardcoded threshold of 0.01. The colinearity test is carried (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Very small triangle and a quad that thinks its a tri
|
|
(...) I'm guessing this is a limitation of the accuracy of the l3p -check, so probably ignorable. Does the -dist option affect this test too, or just the coplanar quad test? Maybe there could be another option in l3p to adjust the accuracy of the (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Very small triangle and a quad that thinks its a tri
|
|
Whilst working out the non-right-angled cylinder intersection sub-parts for the Boat Rigging pieces I have run into two related problems 1) I have a triangle A-B-C that is so tiny that L3P reports it as co-linear and L3Lab doesn't render it (it (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
