 | | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
|
|
i think that we should have a group for MOC's, a group for parts posts and a group for TLG sets. (26 years ago, 3-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Request: 30200
|
|
Karim, your timing is good. My son and I just spent 4 hours last night building several of your microfig Star Wars creations, and so you are high on my "thank you" list. (I only wish I had more 1x1 black tiles.) I have the cockpit part, and have (...) (26 years ago, 3-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: How big is your VEC dir?
|
|
Since I know what just about every peice is named in LDraw, I find ONYX's part search program much more useful than the VEC, so I've deleted my VEC dir (sorry Steve - I still use the other useful functions of LDAO, though) --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o (...) (26 years ago, 3-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Tracker news
|
|
(...) That is what I thought should happen. I view the tracker as being an aide to piece authors, to prevent duplication of work. I rarely ever go check the Tracker page myself. I consider it the authors responsibility to check the page before (...) (26 years ago, 3-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
|
|
I was wondering what was taking Todd so long to reply (he usually pounces on questions directed his way) and now I see he was writing a thesis on the topic. Thanks for the in-depth response. The major reason I see for separating out parts and (...) (26 years ago, 3-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
