 | | Re: ldraw.org
|
|
(...) I'm just speaking for myself, but I think that this is because people would rather see a site now with content than an professional-looking one later that is easy to navigate. In other words, there are few reasons to give over the James (...) (26 years ago, 23-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldraw.org
|
|
(...) It is a work in progress, but a couple things need to happen first. I still need to iron out kinks in the Lego Maniac's Webring site and make it public before starting work on the new ldraw.org site. Also, I want to take my time on this and (...) (26 years ago, 23-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | ldraw.org
|
|
dod anything ever come off about the possible creation of ldraw.org? is it work in progress or has the idea been abandoned? (26 years ago, 23-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part naming ideas
|
|
(...) That one doesn't look like radar to me. Planetary Targeting Display, maybe. Steve (26 years ago, 22-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part naming ideas
|
|
(...) That's not a bad idea. Maybe if we defined that as a 'miscellaneous accessory' category, and had other, more specific sub-categories, like "Minifig Tool" and "Minifig Weapon". But is a speargun a weapon, or a tool? Steve (26 years ago, 22-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD Question...
|
|
(...) I *suppose* it should not rely on it. But it would be a good first indicator. Steve (26 years ago, 22-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD Question...
|
|
LDLite currently does not rely on the filename for anything. But if it could use the extension to tell .dat and .mpd files apart, that would help. Should it? -gyug (...) (26 years ago, 21-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part naming ideas
|
|
(...) or "ResQ chainsaw body", or "Race pneumatic hammer body"? (...) "Town Flashlight"? (...) "Ninja Flying platform handlebars"? (...) "Town Camcorder"? (...) "Paradisa beachcomber metal detector"? Perhaps theme groupings are very useful. -gyug (26 years ago, 21-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part naming ideas
|
|
(...) How about "Minifig Accessory"? (26 years ago, 21-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | L3P + L3GO - rumor or fact?
|
|
Is it true that L3P will now use L3GO bricks where available? If so, where should the L3GO part files be placed? I ask because of my quest for perfection on a perfectly-rendered Galaxy Explorer, and those sloped cones are just God-awful ugly right (...) (26 years ago, 20-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
