|
|
 | | Re: LDR - New LDraw File Extension
|
| (...) This is Not exactly required! (...) Yes, but it will break compatibility, with older programs. (...) Don't really know. (...) So, the actual goal, of switching to an unambigous extension, doesn't really work, because, everybody, must keep (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
| | | | | Re: LDR - New LDraw File Extension
|
| Hello, (...) its (...) LEdit can be changed. I did it myself. Just patch the extension with a hex-editor from .DAT to LDR. No reverse-engineering necessary ;)) Greetings Carsten (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
| | | | | Re: [Parts Tracker] Daily News
|
| (...) Try searching for '2599*' or 'flipper*'. Partsref doesn't do partial-word matches by default. Steve (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv)
| | | | | Re: ldglite 0.9.4
|
| (...) Yuck. I'm not allocating anything really HUGE on the stack. Plus I can't think of a good way to check in C if a stack allocation fails. On the other hand, the offscreen image buffer IS huge, but that's allocated on the heap, and I do check to (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: ldglite 0.9.4
|
| (...) Hmmm... I tried in Bash, and suddenly it worked. Tried again in Tcsh, and it didn't work. Ran `limit stacksize unlimited` and tried again. Then it worked. Apparently you allocate some data on the stack without checking if the allocation (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
