 | | Re: Datsville Overview Map (Was: Boundary Box Utility)
|
| (...) I think realtime rendering qualifies as above statement (25 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: BFC revisited
|
| I have printed the bfcspec file for review. Hopefully I will get a response back to you. I have been using BFC in most all my new parts for the last six months or so. Please send me the BFC compliant primitives, so that I can be sure I am using them (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: BFC revisited
|
| I forgot to mention: if anyone is interested in looking at the most-recent version of the BFC proposal, it's still at: (URL). The first screen of text is meta-comments about the status of the proposal. The actual proposal starts at the line "LDraw (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: BFC revisited
|
| There was never agreement on what the BFC standard should be. So there aren't very many parts that follow it in any way. I do have a set of primitives that are BFC-compliant. I didn't straighten out all the primitives, but I did a number of them. I (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | BFC revisited
|
| I'm looking for a model file that utilizes BFC-certified parts to test backface culling in the CAD application I'm developing. Unfortunately, as near as I can tell, only 13 part files have a BFC-related comment, and on top of that, they're not (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
