 | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
|
At the risk of being flamed into lurk mode, I'm going to ask the following: Why do we need the official TLG part numbers? Why not just use a numbering system that makes sense? (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
onyx wrote in message ... (...) on (...) in (...) i (...) never (...) That's gravy, man. The more the merrier. Roy (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LF vs. CRLF in server .DAT script
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) Try this ( actual method used at SVCC in 1974 ). Tape your thumb to the second joint of your index finger of your right hand. Now put your left hand in your pocket. Now count to count to 6 in octal with your (...) (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Quality of authored parts
|
|
John VanZwieten wrote in message ... (...) Thank you, John, you have boiled it all down to its component parts. I can think of no reason not to follow any of your points. That does include the "don't get personal" aside. Well done. Bravo Zulu Roy (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LF vs. CRLF in server .DAT script
|
|
(...) Grrr, where is my brain today. I meant that I wrote print "$_\015\010"; when I meant to write print "$_\015\012"; I always get octal wrong, durnit. (But ASCII octal values "\015\012" are more portable than writing "\r\n" in this case, because (...) (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
