 | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
(...) Yes, and 'may' is more more correct than 'should', since the "Rendering Engine Requirements" section really is included just to provide a framework for the language extensions. The document specifies the input, and we have a general (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Update 9906?
|
|
(...) Not too many all at once! At least on the first go-round. After that, the more, the merrier! :) (...) Yay, Terry! (...) Terry has sent me a copy of everything he has received, post 99-06. He is also going to forward future mail to me. New part (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Problem with the LDraw Parts Tracker
|
|
Hello all, Boys and girs, I'm having a problem with the LDraw Parts Tracker. The link towards the "Tracked Parts" page still works, although only the text part of the page comes up. I don't get the seegreen background I've been used to see there (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
[ Still discussing (URL) ] Rui: (...) Yes, but generally it is no big deal to certify a model file - and there is the suggested option for the renderers mentioned further down for the lazy. (...) Yes, but we aren't all that stupid. We will of cause (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Update 9906?
|
|
Great news to see things moving again - many thanks, Steve. A great motivation for me to get those parts off the "drawing board" and into DAT files. Many, many thanks are due to Terry for all his hard work, adjudication and perseverance in the past. (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Update 9906?
|
|
(...) Ditto. This message is x-posted to lugnet.cad.dev. (...) Terry plans on finishing things up for 99-06. I'll start with 99-07. Well, it might be the 2000-01 update, if there isn't enough of 1999 left to go around. (...) I was waiting for 9906 (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
(...) Agreed, it's logical. Should is too strong ! not like must, but strong anyway. (...) of course, but all files start on one root, if that is no BFC certified, than no acceleration. (...) but a certified part can have sub parts not certified ! (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Update 9906?
|
|
[ XFUT lugnet.cad ] Adam Howard asked when the next parts update will show up. Terry has been much too busy lately, to work on the parts update (or play with LEGO for that matter), so he has handed the task of preparing the parts updates over to (...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Update 9906?
|
|
(...) Terry (the person who takes care of the voting) said that he was going on vacation in August and we haven't heard from him since. Leonardo (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Update 9906?
|
|
Hi! When is the next parts update going to be posted for official download? ldraw.org and the mirror site show 9905 as the last official update. Voting for 9906 was completed in August wasn't it? Just curious...not impatient. Thanks, Adam (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
Steve: I have a small linguistic correction, but except for that, I consider the document finished: There will be a few requirements placed on the design of rendering programs, in order to achieve correct renderings. Any program should may violate (...) (25 years ago, 6-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
(...) As I said it is not ready iet. The questions (options) that where up in the air, are still there, no one as discussed them, after this spec file was created. I don't have much time now, but here are several problems. Examples: check the (...) (25 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
Steve: (...) I think it is ready, but I will print out a copy, and check it tonight. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
(...) I haven't had time to reply, hope to have soon. (...) NO ! It's not quite done iet ! 8) (...) Rui Martins (25 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
(...) There hasn't been any discussion on this in almost two weeks. Does everyone like this spec? Any issues? Are you programmers willing to implement this? Is it ready to go to press? Steve (25 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT to DXF
|
|
Jaco van der Molen (Sjaacko) wrote ... (...) (URL) lacks a link to 3DWin: (URL) (25 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | DAT to DXF
|
|
Hi all, I know it is out there: DAT to DXF... but where? Can anyone point the URL out for me? Tnx. -- Greetingz... Sjaacko (25 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: My first DAT file!
|
|
(...) See my second model... posted to lugnet.cad.dat.models You may have to cut-n-paste the model out and look at it in MLCad though as LDLite gets stuck close to the end. I would really like to know what the issue is there... it makes me loath to (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: My first DAT file!
|
|
John VanZwieten wrote ... (...) the (...) camera (...) I think it is unfortunate that MLCad uses the same "0 ROTATE" command as LDLite. Other parsers (like L3P :) may get confused. L3P can skip 0 ROTATE 180 0 0 REL 0 ROTATE 90 0 0 ABS 0 ROTATE 10 0 (...) (25 years ago, 1-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw pieces printing
|
|
(...) Yeah, except this time I didn't back absolutely everything up, and I had to get help with the network settings. OBLEGO: What happened to the 9906 update? Hasn't it been about 4 months since we voted? (pardon my ignorance or lack of tact if the (...) (25 years ago, 30-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
