Subject:
|
Re: Line in the Sand
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Nov 1999 17:26:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2468 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 6 Nov 1999 20:50:24 GMT, sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk (Jacob Sparre Andersen)
wrote:
> Steve:
>
> I have a small linguistic correction, but except for that,
> I consider the document finished:
>
> There will be a few requirements placed on the design of rendering programs,
> in order to achieve correct renderings. Any program should may violate
> ^^^^^^^^^^
> Wouldn't "may" be sufficient?
Yes, and 'may' is more more correct than 'should', since the "Rendering Engine
Requirements" section really is included just to provide a framework for the
language extensions. The document specifies the input, and we have a general
understanding about what the output should be, but the stuff in the middle is
internal to the rendering engine, and it can operate anyway the programmer
wants.
Maybe "Rendering Engine Requirements" should be renamed to something less
forceful?
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| Steve: I have a small linguistic correction, but except for that, I consider the document finished: There will be a few requirements placed on the design of rendering programs, in order to achieve correct renderings. Any program should may violate (...) (25 years ago, 6-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
85 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
