Subject:
|
Re: Line in the Sand
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Nov 1999 20:24:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4015 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999 16:38:50 GMT, Rui Martins <Rui.Martins@link.pt> wrote:
> of course, but all files start on one root, if that is no BFC certified,
> than no acceleration.
As Jacob said, this is why the specification suggests that rendering programs
allow the user to select the option of defaulting CLIPPING to on or off.
> but a certified part can have sub parts not certified ! hence another
> no-go.
Huh? In that case, the uncertified primitive is not back-face-culled, but the
certified part is bfc'ed. How do want to improve this? The rendering engine
can't bfc un-certified files.
> Every file (primitive / subpart / part / model) once certified, will
> benefit for itself, as long as CLIPPING is LOCAL.
Nope. No subfile in a rendering, which is below an uncertified file, can assume
it is normal or inverted. It doesn't matter if we define CLIPPING as local or
passed-down.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Line in the Sand [DAT]
|
| (...) Strange sentence, CLIPPING is OFF by default, you can change that by including a CLIPPING ON. And this was not what was beeing discussed. See below. (...) Look at this two trees root root C N / \ / \ C N C N /| |\ /| |\ C N C N C N C N 1 2 3 4 (...) (27 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| (...) Agreed, it's logical. Should is too strong ! not like must, but strong anyway. (...) of course, but all files start on one root, if that is no BFC certified, than no acceleration. (...) but a certified part can have sub parts not certified ! (...) (27 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
85 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
