|
|
 | | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
| (...) Age, nothing. You've just written too many part files. ;) Steve -- It's all Bill Gates' fault. (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
| (...) I agree with that. There are 8 parts which contain references to 4-4con12.dat: 6246A.DAT 6246B.DAT 6246C.DAT 6246D.DAT 6246E.DAT 751.DAT 755.DAT 104.DAT If no one minds, I'll change the 4-4con12.dat references in those parts to 4-4con1.dat, (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Voting page for 9906 [DAT]
|
| It means you have quads with the vertices in "bow-tie" order, rather than clockwise or counter-clockwise order. The corrected sequence for the line below would be: 4 16 16 144 6 16 140 6 -16 140 6 -16 144 6 LDraw handles "bowties" ok, but other (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
| I did this to the two parts I created, and I got lots (and I mean *lots*) of lines that looked like this: WARNING "6056.DAT" Line 28: Bad vertex sequence, 0132 used: 4 16 16 144 6 16 140 6 -16 144 6 -16 140 6 What does this mean? Jeff (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
| How about: l3p -check -AUTHOR a9906 >c9906.txt I have reached the age I now can't recall which files are mine just by the file name... /Tore "Lars C. Hassing" wrote: <...> (...) <...> (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
| Lars C. Hassing <lch@ccieurope.com> wrote in message news:57F1FE754246D21...@aarhus... (...) Not my part, but currently, I have a 4-4con12.dat in my /p directory, which I think should be renamed to 4-4con1.dat. (...) I checked this one, and in this (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: POV-RAY orange color
|
| (...) blue. (...) 44 is trans orange, 48 is like a trans black that l3p doesn't recognize. On 8/18/1999, at 10:14 PM, D Garcia wrote: (...) I seem to remember that this came out as a yellowish color. I guess I'll have to try it again. Ryan "Now I go (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
| (...) writes: (...) posting from (...) If I'm (...) stopping you from (...) would sign a (...) this: (...) a written (...) Funny, Todd :-) I really don't think it matters which way he signs it; we know what JW means. :) Ryan "You have to stick to (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
| (...) Me neither! But then again, I don't have any parts in this update. Duh. But I'd just like to say that using L3P to check a part is very convenient. Now that I know of the feature, I use it all the time when I model a part, not only just before (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
| On Thu, 19 Aug 1999 09:37:36 GMT, "Lars C. Hassing" <lch@ccieurope.com> wrote: [L3P report snipped] Yay! I'm not on the L3P error-list this time! Of course, I've only got one part in the update, and it's fairly simple. Steve (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
