 | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
OK, for some reason, I love to vote on things (I.E. voting in elections and the like) but for JW, seems like a waste. I will do so soon, however! BTW! (Back to Work) Scott Sanburn (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
I know, but with politics and work getting most of my anger, a quick delete works for me. The quote to Onyx (sp?)?) did it for me, I guess. Scott Sanburn (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
(...) No, you're missing out! I occasionally read his posts for a quick laugh or two. [1] Greg "..A year later, I was transferred to the moon, worse pay, better hours.." Majewski citrusx__@yahoo.com (URL) Though they usually end up with me shouting (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
Hi Scott, Please Note: You don't have to participate in the vote, however the outcome will be decided by those who do participate. So please participate one way or the other. Your vote will count. Thanks, Adam Scott Edward Sanburn (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
I found a simpler solution to JW's posts. I delete them if I see them. If he improves, fine. If not, in the trash it goes. Scott Sanburn (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
Followup-To: lugnet.admin.general This is a Call For Votes (CFV) After much discussion it has been decided that an open public vote needs to be made about this situation. The vote is at the end of this message. Please read the Problem Summary and (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
Jeff Stembel wrote in message ... (...) I am surprised I even showed up!!! D M Garcia "A pessimist is an experienced optimist" (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Any 2X2 round areas w/ peghole?
|
|
there's the newer wheels from 3051 Blaze Attack, also used in the y-wing set different color.. though I don't believe those have been drawn yet??? unless they are older.. though it's bigger than 2x2... it might give you the inside at least... (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Any 2X2 round areas w/ peghole?
|
|
Can anyone think of an L-Drawn piece with a section similar to a 2x2 round brick with a peghole? I'm working on the R2D2 body and would love to steal this section from another part. -John Van (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
(...) Yeah.. that's probably about the time I switched ISP's... so I had to re-register... I wonder if I can get the Mookie back in here... :) I'm sure a lot lower on the lists then I expected to be.. of course I think I send more stuff e-mail on (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Why TLG doesn't have a leg to stand on anymore.
|
|
(...) Copyright laws are pretty the much the same for the reasons you list, with a few exceptions. However, lego cad programs don't infringe on *any* copyrights, only Trademarks and (possibly, but not likely) intelectual property rights. (...) It (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
(...) Wow! Fouteenth place! I didn't think it'd be that high! :) (...) Looks to me like someone changed their posting setup. ;) (...) Whoa Nelly! Third! Cool! :) (...) Yes! I made it into the top ten! ;) (...) Third again. Cool! (...) Sixth! Cool! (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Why TLG doesn't have a leg to stand on anymore.
|
|
Leonardo Zide wrote in message <37B811B3.16EA370B@c...com.br>... (...) Reminds of hearing that all windows -emulation projects (like WINE) should be moved to australia because you are allowed to reverse engineer there. (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
(...) Thanks for pointing that out. I feel much better now... Serves me right for not scrolling down to the end of the original message. Steve (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
|
(...) you (...) I know, but I was talking about the three libraries in the statement above, not L3P. (...) True. (...) Exactly. (...) This is exactly the reason for joining efforts: to handle all parts, yet use the best quality parts where possible. (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
(...) Lehman) wrote: (...) ---...--- (...) as many (...) lately. (...) messages? You (...) ---...--- (...) Yeh, well, here you do too, almost. 100 more posts than the person with the second most posts is a considerable difference. :) I couldn't (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
Steve, in your case "better behaved" means lots of posts, as your content is always so good! -John Van Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:37b82276.754267...net.com... (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: My Final Word On All This
|
|
(...) But don't be afraid to ask *good* questions. The hard part is to know the difference between good and bad questions. Before you post a question, ask yourself: "Can I answer this myself?" (...) Good idea. I hope we can all do that. Steve (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
(...) Ouch. I had no idea what a big-mouth I've been. Nearly twice as many posts as anyone else. I *think* I've been better-behaved lately. Todd, could you run another analysis, but only count recent messages? You can decide what recent means. (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
|
I support what you are trying to do in the voting but it may be more straightforward to present a series of up/down propositions and commentary that the broader ones will supercede the narrower ones if passed. (...) Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
