Subject:
|
Re: i admit i was wrong
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 16 Aug 1999 14:35:31 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@+stopspammers+novera.com
|
Viewed:
|
1377 times
|
| |
|
|
I support what you are trying to do in the voting but it may be more
straightforward to present a series of up/down propositions and
commentary that the broader ones will supercede the narrower ones if
passed.
Tim Courtney wrote:
>
> At 04:36 PM 8/15/99 , Todd Lehman wrote:
> > TimC and AdamH are putting together a CFV motion. There may be several
> > semi-overlapping and/or independent options to consider:
> >
> > 1) remove JW's posting privileges to lugnet.cad.dev
> > 2) remove JW's posting privileges to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
> > 3) remove JW's posting privileges to lugnet.cad.dev.dat.parts.*
> > 4) remove JW's posting privileges to lugnet.cad.dev.dat.*
> > 5) remove JW's posting privileges to lugnet.cad.*
> > 5) remove JW's posting privileges to lugnet.*
> > 6) fill-in-the-blank
> >
> > As I understand it, some mix of the above would be the outcome if a
> > delivered ultimatum was not met within some proscribed time period.
>
> About these voting options, the votes for a more severe restriction should
> carry over to a less severe restriction if that particular restriction
> recieves the 2/3 majority votes. For example:
>
> 25% vote for removal from lugnet.*
> 50% vote for removal from lugnet.cad.*
> 25% vote not to remove JW's privileges at all
>
> Now this is an oversimplification of the case, but this is to prove a point
> and kill a headache on my part by making things a little mroe realistic :)
>
> The votes for lugnet.* would be counted as votes for lugnet.cad.* since
> cad.* is included under lugnet.* and lugnet.cad.* received more
> votes. This would push the votes for lugnet.cad.* to 75%, thus exceeding
> the 2/3 majority requirement.
>
> -Tim <><
>
> http://www.zacktron.com
> http://www.ldraw.org
> AIM: timcourtne
> ICQ: 23951114
>
> Commonwealth Edison: What do you do with OUR power?
>
> Get paid to surf the web! Visit:
> http://www.alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=DGO655
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.
NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
| (...) About these voting options, the votes for a more severe restriction should carry over to a less severe restriction if that particular restriction recieves the 2/3 majority votes. For example: 25% vote for removal from lugnet.* 50% vote for (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
146 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
