 | | Re: Why TLG doesn't have a leg to stand on anymore.
|
|
(...) Copyright laws are pretty the much the same for the reasons you list, with a few exceptions. However, lego cad programs don't infringe on *any* copyrights, only Trademarks and (possibly, but not likely) intelectual property rights. (...) It (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
(...) Wow! Fouteenth place! I didn't think it'd be that high! :) (...) Looks to me like someone changed their posting setup. ;) (...) Whoa Nelly! Third! Cool! :) (...) Yes! I made it into the top ten! ;) (...) Third again. Cool! (...) Sixth! Cool! (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Why TLG doesn't have a leg to stand on anymore.
|
|
Leonardo Zide wrote in message <37B811B3.16EA370B@c...com.br>... (...) Reminds of hearing that all windows -emulation projects (like WINE) should be moved to australia because you are allowed to reverse engineer there. (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
(...) Thanks for pointing that out. I feel much better now... Serves me right for not scrolling down to the end of the original message. Steve (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
|
(...) you (...) I know, but I was talking about the three libraries in the statement above, not L3P. (...) True. (...) Exactly. (...) This is exactly the reason for joining efforts: to handle all parts, yet use the best quality parts where possible. (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
(...) Lehman) wrote: (...) ---...--- (...) as many (...) lately. (...) messages? You (...) ---...--- (...) Yeh, well, here you do too, almost. 100 more posts than the person with the second most posts is a considerable difference. :) I couldn't (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
Steve, in your case "better behaved" means lots of posts, as your content is always so good! -John Van Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:37b82276.754267...net.com... (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: My Final Word On All This
|
|
(...) But don't be afraid to ask *good* questions. The hard part is to know the difference between good and bad questions. Before you post a question, ask yourself: "Can I answer this myself?" (...) Good idea. I hope we can all do that. Steve (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
(...) Ouch. I had no idea what a big-mouth I've been. Nearly twice as many posts as anyone else. I *think* I've been better-behaved lately. Todd, could you run another analysis, but only count recent messages? You can decide what recent means. (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
|
I support what you are trying to do in the voting but it may be more straightforward to present a series of up/down propositions and commentary that the broader ones will supercede the narrower ones if passed. (...) Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
