|
|
 | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
| (...) Yes, but that could cause problems down the road. We do try to find numbers for as many parts as possible, but sometimes the TLG part number is not available. We will have to have a system of updating the models once official numbers become (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
| (...) number? How (...) What do you mean? If a piece gots voted in then it's official even if we don't know a number for it, correct? Ryan (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
| (...) In this context, A/R just means picky about details in a Good Way. --Todd (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
| (...) Is there a reason to put all the errors in one place, instead of putting a comment (or a 0 WRITE) before the plain-in-place-of-patterned line? But extras.dat is still needed. And what about part mock-ups for which there is no known part (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: LDraw and 8.3
|
| (...) Ah. And I have now wiped GNAT off my system, so I couldn't tell which one it was. Windows Explorer thinks the compiled file (buildmpd.exe) is a DOS executable. But long file names are handled correctly, I checked both buildmpd.exe and (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
