|
|
 | | Re: Suggestion for part authors
|
| (...) Good suggestion John. Something else for the QA process. I think I mentioned this before, but it would be real neat if there were a super-wireframe mode that rendered all optional lines. Any chance of this sometime in the future please, Paul ? (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Part Name Question
|
| (...) Now that I think about it, it probably isn't necessary. I had a hard time positioning things on the end using John's mock-up, but I just realized it was probably because he was using one of the 'stud' primitives. So, Nevermind. ;) Jeff (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Part Name Question
|
| (...) Hadn't thought about that. Is it that important to view a stud instead of a line in LEdit? Seems like this piece has a 'normal geometry', so that it wouldn't make sense to defeat the line-as-stud option. (...) Yes. Steve (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Suggestion for part authors
|
| Just thought I'd mention that the wireframe view in LDLite is a great tool for part authors to check the edge lines and conditional lines in their parts before submission. Edge line omissions are usually much more obvious in this view, so take a (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Voting Comments
|
| (...) There's a Sort function, but it sorts by position, bottom-to-top, back-to-front. I put it there to help me transition models from the "adding pieces to the file when it's convenient" mode to the "present new pieces in order for other people to (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
