 | | Re: Voting Comments
|
|
"John VanZwieten" <john_vanzwieten@msn.com> writes: It's a good thing you spend so much effort to verify the parts! (...) It is probably a bad practice to use two 1-4cyli.dats on each side and rotate them partially to make space for the peg hole, as (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Space Craters Baseplate? [DAT]
|
|
(...) Here it is. Three files: The first is the plate the proper studs. The second is the outline of the mountain in blue. The third is a combination of the first and second. ---...---CUT HERE---...--- 0 Baseplate 32 x 32 with Space Mountains 0 (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: Voting Page
|
|
"Lars" says: ---...--- 290.DAT: Technic Shock Absorber Large, Lower Half (...) Shouldn't these be line type 5 ? (...) Shouldn't the color be 16? (Problem is several places in file) 2909.DAT: Technic Shock Absorber Large, Upper Half Here are also (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Comments
|
|
(...) The back of the head in the subpart does indeed use a 2-4cyli primitive. You have a good point, but I am concerned about the two slices of cone-like quads which form the curves above and below the cylindrical face area (on the front of the (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Comments
|
|
(...) Good observations, all. (...) Ah ha! A question I can answer! I asked Tore the same question, and he assured me the part is indeed studless. As shown. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
