| | Re: Dimensions of the parts
|
|
Lars C. Hassing skrev i meddelandet <57F1FE754246D211A98...aarhus>... (...) One could go further down the algorithmic lane, and construct a 'bounding box' or 'convex hull' to get some indication of inside/outside. Not watertight though (think Lego (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Dimensions of the parts
|
|
Leonardo Zide skrev i meddelandet <3712B018.76665708@c...com.br>... (...) another (...) If any two corners of a (planar) face, from one brick, is on opposite sides of a (planar) face of the other brick, they must be intersecting (not completely (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: <Snipped the Lengthy but interesting Message> What about new Primitives? Would they go into the .parts subcatagory? Also, I'm somewhat talented at making the small bitmaps for new parts. Would they (Dat (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Lego CAD for Mac?
|
|
Is there, or is anyone working on a program akin to LDraw for the Mac? Rob (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
|
|
(...) I think that having a cad.dat.creations would be a great idea but I have to agree, What would happen to cad.dat? (...) I think these belong in this subcatagory. (...) I think that these should be considered MOCs, but with the set as a (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|