 | | Re: why re-submit x-4disc files?... —Franklin W. Cain
|
| | | (...) OK, then someone needs to document that in the files... (For ex.: "0 2002-05-05 MK converted triangles to quads to save space") Thanks, Franklin (23 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: why re-submit x-4disc files?... —Mark Kennedy
|
| | | | (...) I added the comments like you suggested, but the old hold votes weren't deleted when I resubmitted the parts. (23 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: why re-submit x-4disc files?... —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Either: a) You rechecked the details pages too soon, before the PT had a chance to clear the votes, or b) You rechecked too late, after Carsten and Franklin had re-reviewed the files. Steve (23 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: why re-submit x-4disc files?... —Mark Kennedy
|
| | | | (...) deleted (...) Actualy I checked them 2 days later and it still doesn't say that a new version of the part was submitted. Maybe it's because they are fixed versions of official parts? (23 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: why re-submit x-4disc files?... —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Look at this log for 4-4disc.dat: (URL) It shows on May 7, the old votes were wiped out and a new version was submitted. Carsten then certified the new version, and Franklin held it. Steve (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: why re-submit x-4disc files?... —Mark Kennedy
|
| | | | (...) version (...) It seams that the part has been deleted. What was the reason? I never got to see the comments? (23 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: why re-submit x-4disc files?... —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) See this message, (URL). Steve (23 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| | | | |
