To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitivesOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / Primitives / 190
189  |  191
Subject: 
Two questions on primitives
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives
Date: 
Thu, 28 Mar 2002 04:21:05 GMT
Viewed: 
19 times
  
Two questions (if these have already been discussed, just direct me to the
appropriate LUGNET post):

1.) I've noticed the new BFC complient primitives on the Parts Tracker.  How
are we going to resolve the fact that the cylindar primitve can be used as
both outside and inside surfaces.  The only way I see is to have 2 diffent
primitives, one for outside applications and one for inside uses.

2.) How come there are no x-16 cylindar primitives.  If there is no
particular reason, I think maybe I'll whip them up real quick when I have
some time.

-Orion



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Two questions on primitives
 
(...) The INVERTNEXT directive takes care of this problem. Quoted from BFC proposal: "INVERTNEXT This option inverts a subfile. It may only be used immediately before a subfile command line, and it only influences the immediately following subfile (...) (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
  Re: Two questions on primitives
 
(...) There's no 1-16cyli.dat primitive because it hasn't been needed/asked for. The general approach is to not introduce primitives until they're needed. Steve (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)

10 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR