| | Re: Torus Primitives on the Part Tracker
|
|
(...) Cool! (...) More cool! (...) the two related part files, neither of which is certified, I'd say go ahead and update t04q3333.dat. (...) Certainly. Steve (21 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
| | Torus Primitives on the Part Tracker
|
|
Hello, I have been updating some of the torus primitve files to use quads, and conditional lines instead of cylinder primitves. I have had too many problems getting the cylinder files to show without gaps. I have a new tool that can generate any (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
| | Primitive part file reviewing on the Parts Tracker
|
|
Hello all parts authors, Here is a note to say that I have been studying Primitives in detail lately. I will be making some changes on the primitive reviews I have made recently. So some parts will probably come off the certified list until the (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
| | Re: Peghole BFC?
|
|
(...) I'm not sure about using stud4 on the bottom of Brick 1x1 Round - it would somewhat odd when rendered in 'stud as line' mode; the bottom portion of the brick would be missing. (...) Your expectation is correct. The 'inside' surface of (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
| | Peghole BFC?
|
|
Hi all, While going through some of James' original parts, correcting for BFC (and occasionally making appropriate changes, since these came before the ring primitives), I noticed that he used the peghole DAT for making bottom studs (see the Brick 1 (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
| | Technic Fig Parts and Orientation (Was: Connect7.dat)
|
|
(...) Oh, I missed that thread, since I included the keyword 'Action' in my search. :) My point of view is animation, but I think a generator's view is quite similar. I've read somewhere that the main object in animating a human or humaniod is the (...) (21 years ago, 15-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
| | Re: Is this name free? Connect7.dat - Technic Pin Fake
|
|
(...) OK - let's keep in touch regarding this, to avoid duplicating effort. My progress (as mentioned in (URL) is with the regular arm and torso parts - although the mech-arms from the competition sets look fun. I'll resurrect my efforts and post an (...) (21 years ago, 15-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
| | Re: Is this name free? Connect7.dat - Technic Pin Fake [DAT]
|
|
(...) I suspect it is used in more parts, but the parts I work on is 2709.dat* Technic Action Figure Lower Leg as well as the upper leg parts. *) according to (URL) but my part has # 2704 It wouldn't surprise me if the file really is BFC certified, (...) (21 years ago, 15-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
| | Re: Is this name free? Connect7.dat - Technic Pin Fake
|
|
(...) Yes - this is free, and I think it makes sense to group this with the "real" Technic connectors. We really _would_ like all new primitives to be BFC CERTIFIED, though. Where is this fake pin used? Chris (21 years ago, 15-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
| | Is this name free? Connect7.dat - Technic Pin Fake [DAT]
|
|
0 Technic Pin Fake 0 Name: connect7.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 0 2 1 5.801 0 1 5.543 0 2.296 0 2 1 5.543 0 2.296 4.243 0 4.243 0 2 24 4.243 0 4.243 2.296 0 5.543 0 2 24 2.296 0 5.543 0 0 6 0 2 24 0 0 6 -2.296 0 5.543 0 2 24 -2.296 0 (...) (21 years ago, 14-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|