 | | Re: high-res sphere primitive with type 5 lines
|
|
(...) Excellent- thanks! Now I can submit my Primo parts to the tracker. Though the "same layout" warning makes me wonder if I'll have to rework them... -- Tony Hafner www.hafhead.com (24 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: high-res sphere primitive with type 5 lines
|
|
(...) Is that true for all three edges of the sphere? [snip] (...) [snip] I thought you were generating to 4 decimals? You know, like this: (...) [snip] Steve (24 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: duplicate primitives?
|
|
(...) I'm not *against* such a change, but I'm not a big supporter of it. Maybe if we could revive the old primitives committee (you all know who you are), or if there was another admin for the PT who could oversee this project, that would be a good (...) (24 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: ring 3 to 5
|
|
(...) I wasn't thinking of either, really. I was wondering if maybe the part should be modeled without any primitives at all. I suppose the practical result of that would be primitive-inlining. (...) In the case of the lower arm (forearm), I don't (...) (24 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: high-res sphere primitive with type 5 lines [DAT]
|
|
Well, based on comments in some other threads, I came to the conclusion that the type 5 lines I had around the edge of my original primitive where wrong. I have now updated them accordingly. This version is the same as the last other than that. The (...) (24 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
