 | | Re: Hi-Res primitives : was - [Idea] New kind of tore for large diameter
|
|
Oooopps! The Torus zip file must have evaporated from my website, I have replaced it, so it should download now. Thank you for all the emails letting me know. Paul (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Hi-Res primitives : was - [Idea] New kind of tore for large diameter
|
|
On the subject of Hi-Res primitives, I have been developing several lately. Should we have a "new" posting group so that they do not get mistakenly downloaded as "16's". So far the "48's" primitves I have made are, 1-4con1.dat thru 1-4con10.dat (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jul-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: ring5.dat and new ring6.dat [DAT]
|
|
(...) I just added the comment block and did new RING6 primitive, Both peices have been submitted to parts@ldraw.org for inclusion in the next update. 0 0 Ring Radius 6:7 0 Name: ring6.dat 0 based on 1-4ring6.dat by Franklin W. Cain (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: ring5.dat
|
|
(...) Why? I'm aware that disc, cyli, edge, ndis have 4-4-prefix, but not the 4-4rings. And I would probably forget to look for 4-4ring primitives when there are those who begin with just ring. (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: ring5.dat
|
|
(...) The code looks generally good. :) I haven't carefully checked the numbers, in picayune-mode. But you should: - Change the name to 4-4ring5.dat - Add a standard header. Something like: 0 Ring 5 x 1.0 0 Name: 4-4ring5.dat 0 Author: Mark Kennedy (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | ring5.dat [DAT]
|
|
here is a new ring primitive 0 4 16 5 0 0 4.6195 0 1.9135 5.5433 0 2.2961 6 0 0 4 16 4.6195 0 1.9135 3.5355 0 3.5355 4.2426 0 4.2426 5.5433 0 2.2961 4 16 3.5355 0 3.5355 1.9135 0 4.6195 2.2961 0 5.5433 4.2426 0 4.2426 4 16 1.9135 0 4.6195 0 0 5 0 0 (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: New unofficial 2-4ring2.dat primitive
|
|
(...) You're right. I'm a bit green and posted in a burst of enthusiasm. As is many times the case, I realized what you've pointed out shortly after leaving the message. Thanks for the feedback. The good news is that the piece I'm doing, although (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: New unofficial 2-4ring2.dat primitive [DAT]
|
|
(...) This look OK, but is not consistent with the other 2-4ring* primitives. Yours comprises the two quadrants in the -z direction - for consistency I believe it should comprise the two quadrants in the +z direction. This already exists in the (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | New unofficial 2-4ring2.dat primitive [DAT]
|
|
Hi all, In the process of creating piece 6643 (technic flex system connector), I've noticed the lack of several official primitive that I need. Included in this message is the first. Please notice that I am stil somewhat green in Ldraw (but I have (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Alternative possible hi-res sphere primitive
|
|
(...) Hey, Travis Your hi-res sphere looks great! Much better than the other one available (Sorry, Steve, but it does look smoother and more even). I've begun to model my own Parts and Primitives library in MLCad. I've run into a wall with modelling (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
