 | | ring5.dat [DAT]
|
|
here is a new ring primitive 0 4 16 5 0 0 4.6195 0 1.9135 5.5433 0 2.2961 6 0 0 4 16 4.6195 0 1.9135 3.5355 0 3.5355 4.2426 0 4.2426 5.5433 0 2.2961 4 16 3.5355 0 3.5355 1.9135 0 4.6195 2.2961 0 5.5433 4.2426 0 4.2426 4 16 1.9135 0 4.6195 0 0 5 0 0 (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: New unofficial 2-4ring2.dat primitive
|
|
(...) You're right. I'm a bit green and posted in a burst of enthusiasm. As is many times the case, I realized what you've pointed out shortly after leaving the message. Thanks for the feedback. The good news is that the piece I'm doing, although (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: New unofficial 2-4ring2.dat primitive [DAT]
|
|
(...) This look OK, but is not consistent with the other 2-4ring* primitives. Yours comprises the two quadrants in the -z direction - for consistency I believe it should comprise the two quadrants in the +z direction. This already exists in the (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | New unofficial 2-4ring2.dat primitive [DAT]
|
|
Hi all, In the process of creating piece 6643 (technic flex system connector), I've noticed the lack of several official primitive that I need. Included in this message is the first. Please notice that I am stil somewhat green in Ldraw (but I have (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Alternative possible hi-res sphere primitive
|
|
(...) Hey, Travis Your hi-res sphere looks great! Much better than the other one available (Sorry, Steve, but it does look smoother and more even). I've begun to model my own Parts and Primitives library in MLCad. I've run into a wall with modelling (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
