Subject:
|
Re: [Part] Baseplate 32 x 32 with river pattern
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Tue, 29 Feb 2000 16:24:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
986 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Papp Imre wrote:
> 2. What is the correct number of the part? If it is known, please let me
> know. If it isn't, Steve please allocate a three digit part number for it.
The number to use for this file would be 309p02.dat. There might be another
number for the part, but I'll have to ask the numbers people.
> 3. Is the name "Baseplate 32 x 32 with river pattern" acceptable?
Sounds good to me.
Strictly speaking, the name should be:
Baseplate 32 x 32 Service Station with River Pattern
... to follow the patterned-part naming standard. However, the standard name
seems, IMO, somewhat ludicrous. So in this case, the standard should be set
aside.
Maybe the existing parts should be changed:
309.DAT Baseplate 32 x 32 Island
309P01.DAT Baseplate 32 x 32 Island with Service Station Pattern
and this new part would be:
309P01.DAT Baseplate 32 x 32 Island with River Pattern
Which is still a bit odd, but better than "Service Station with River".
So, Ampi, take your pick. Whichever name you want to use.
> 4. Since I have taken the official plain 32 x 32 baseplate as the starting
> point of my part (studs, edges, corners) should I give credit to someone in
> the author line? (The plain baseplate has no author tag).
For 309p01.dat, I did this:
0 Baseplate 32 x 32 Service Station with Pattern
0 Name: 309p01.dat
0 Author: James Jessiman
0 Author: Steve Bliss, pattern
Which is similar to what other people have done.
BTW, any files in ldraw\parts (and most files in ldraw\p) with no author tag
were written by James Jessiman.
> 5. Is it OK, that I have hardcoded all colors in accordance with the real
> part instead of using the generic color number (16)? Since the green color
> on the bank of the river surely represents the grass, it is very unlikely
> that this part may appear with color other than green.
Like JVZ wrote, use 16 for the grass.
> 6. In general the other colors are acceptable for the pattern?
They seem OK. But I haven't dragged out a real part to compare to the computer
version.
> 7. Is the resolution of the river, rocks etc. pattern acceptable?
They seem OK to me. I only looked at the part in L3Lab. It should also be
checked in LDraw, LDLite, and POV-Ray (at least).
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: [Part] Baseplate 32 x 32 with river pattern
|
| Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:qjrnbs0afpcs7p7...4ax.com... (...) another (...) OK. I will use this part number until we find a better one. (...) I'll pick this one. A aggree that Service Station is far from the (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | [Part] Baseplate 32 x 32 with river pattern [DAT]
|
| Dear part authors, I attach the 'Baseplate 32 x 32 with river pattern' part for review and comments. It is in the Canadain mountains set. I consider it cca. 95% ready and before I submit to the official voting process I want to resolve the remaining (...) (25 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
