Subject:
|
Re: Tore's Modulex parts in LDraw
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:55:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
49432 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Michael Heidemann wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Willy Tschager wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> > > This is what I've found. Probably Chris has some more(?)
> >
> > Best would be submitting to the PT since we also have:
> >
> > Mursten: http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptscan.cgi?q=mursten
> > Duplo: http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptscan.cgi?q=duplo
> > Quatro: http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptscan.cgi?q=quatro
> > Minitalia: http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptscan.cgi?q=Minitalia
> >
> > there. I cannot see any reason why we shouldn't have Modulex.
> >
> > w.
> At first thought I am with you, but at second thought I feel that it should not
> be on the parts tracker.
> As far as I know the modulex parts do not fit in real life with the LEGO System
> Bricks.
> So the modulex is much different than the other themes listed.
>
> cu
> mikeheide
That sounds like a challenge to me! (surely someone knows some way they interact
:) ) If someone showed a way these interoperated would that make a different
answer? I don't think LDraw should host clone parts, but these are actually made
by LEGO :)
That said, what does Dave S do with his Megablocks parts? Maybe that would be a
non parts tracker approach to use?
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Tore's Modulex parts in LDraw
|
| (...) At first thought I am with you, but at second thought I feel that it should not be on the parts tracker. As far as I know the modulex parts do not fit in real life with the LEGO System Bricks. So the modulex is much different than the other (...) (14 years ago, 7-Oct-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
