To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.partsOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 6591
6590  |  6592
Subject: 
Modulex parts in LDraw
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
Date: 
Wed, 6 Oct 2010 08:46:28 GMT
Viewed: 
53007 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Willy Tschager wrote:
Best would be submitting to the PT since we also have:

Mursten: http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptscan.cgi?q=mursten
Duplo: http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptscan.cgi?q=duplo
Quatro: http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptscan.cgi?q=quatro
Minitalia: http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptscan.cgi?q=Minitalia

there. I cannot see any reason why we shouldn't have Modulex.

w.

Yes, maybe so. I would love to see them there, but I forsee huge discussions on,
for example:
* Scale. We decided earlier to use a different scale than other parts from LEGO.
That may likely be discussed again. I think the only reasonable approach is to
continue with this special Modulex scale and if needed scale down the Modulex
sub-model by 0.625 if mixed with other LEGO. If we use the same scale as the
rest of LEGO parts, it will be virtually impossible to build anything in for
example ML-Cad.
* If we add Modulex parts, will we also add Modulex colours to LDConfig.ldr? I
would like it there, but I can accept a separate config file as I think 99% of
LDrawers will never use them.
* Naming discussions. Is a part of half-brick height really a plate, or is it a
semi-brick? Or something else?
And so on...

Some resources on Modulex parts:
http://peeron.com/cgi-bin/invcgis/psearch?query=modulex&limit=parts
http://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=P&catID=727
http://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=P&catID=728
http://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=P&catID=729
http://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=P&catID=730



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Tore's Modulex parts in LDraw
 
(...) Best would be submitting to the PT since we also have: Mursten: (4 URLs) I cannot see any reason why we shouldn't have Modulex. w. (14 years ago, 6-Oct-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

12 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR