 | | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature??? —Don Heyse
|
| | | (...) Yeah, but there's always another way. One that preserves the precious backwards compatibility. In this case you could make more subdirectories in the official library. Like the LDRAW/P/48 directory that was created to avoid name conflicts (...) (17 years ago, 28-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature??? —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | (...) Well I've just spent some time on another way. You can make a new version of mklist that works as follows: scan through the parts, if a filename is long then make a new copy of the file with a standardised short file name (possible assigned in (...) (17 years ago, 28-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature??? —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | (...) That's an interesting approach, but I don't know if it'll work for the subpart files that started this thread. I think mklist only handles files in the PARTS directory. The subpart filenames would be embedded in the part files that use them, (...) (17 years ago, 28-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature??? —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | | (...) Darn! In that case I'd suggest making a short filename preparer as a backwards compatibility measure. Perhaps it would bring all longfilename parts into an MPD (with shortened names) or something similar (eg. creates short name versions (...) (17 years ago, 28-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature??? —Don Heyse
|
| | | | (...) To elaborate: Suppose you have a part abcdefg.dat with loads of subparts (Too many to name with the 8.3 restriction). Just make a new subdirectory LDRAW/PARTS/S/abcdefg/ and put the numbered subparts in there (like (...) (17 years ago, 28-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature??? —Travis Cobbs
|
| | | | (...) I'm personally undecided on the issue of long filenames. On the one hand Willy is entirely correct that we probably shouldn't disallow them purely because of ldraw.exe/ledit.exe. On the other hand, Kevin's post that LPub/LSynth would both have (...) (17 years ago, 28-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature??? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Or, we should start by introducing the new standard, use it in a few (relatively obscure) instances, and give the various software authors a chance to sort it out. Considering the general pace of parts releases, a long-named file would be on (...) (17 years ago, 28-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
