 | | Re: Unofficial Part: 2500 1x8 Light Bar —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | (...) Why is the bottom red? Is this a mistake? Jeff (26 years ago, 24-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Unofficial Part: 2500 1x8 Light Bar —Kevin Bane
|
| | | | Jeff Stembel <Dragonelf1@aol.com> wrote in message news:FC8rCo.8Ku@lugnet.com... (...) Man! I GOTTA get the "Reply" and "Reply Group" buttons down! ;) Yes, they ARE a mistake, as well as the chrome interior. Here is a revised part for your perusal. (...) (25 years ago, 29-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Unofficial Part: 2500 1x8 Light Bar —Terry Keller
|
| | | | (...) If they are only used here, then a primitive is out. You could use a single subfile in the parts/s directory. But that is mainly used for subassemblies that are used repeatedly, and where the use would significantly save space and simplify (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Unofficial Part: 2500 1x8 Light Bar —Kevin Bane
|
| | | | Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> wrote in message news:3750d68d.105626...net.com... (...) as (...) or (...) That is what I thought. And as far as I know, they are only used in this model. (...) the (...) That's what I'll do. I STILL have to change (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
