 | | Re: My second part: Fabuland Window part, 3 windows on top
|
|
(...) Yes, that's the thing that caused errors, so I had to correct them. The other adjustments I made was, was to remove some multiple spaces. I guess they were put there to create an even table with straght columns (alternatively just the way (...) (21 years ago, 2-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: My second part: Fabuland Window part, 3 windows on top
|
|
(...) <SKIP DAT file> Dear Tore, Thanks for the revision and the correction of this part. Could you tell me what mistakes I made in the previous version, so that I can avoid making the same mistakes with other parts again. I've tried to compare your (...) (21 years ago, 2-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: My second part: Fabuland Window part, 3 windows on top [DAT]
|
|
(...) Here's my carefully corrected/revised version. 0 Fabuland Window part, 3 windows on top 0 Name: Unknown 0 Author: Sybrand Bonsma 0 Unofficial Element 2 24 1 21 -16 -1 21 -16 2 24 -1 21 -16 -1 24 -16 2 24 -1 24 -16 -32 24 -16 2 24 -32 24 -16 (...) (21 years ago, 1-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New part: 4876.dat - Fabuland Slide - 2 of 2
|
|
Sorry, the later one should titled as '2 of 2' of course. Ampi (21 years ago, 29-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New part: 4876.dat - Fabuland Slide - 1 of 2 [DAT]
|
|
The subpart: 0 ~Fabuland Slide 0 Name: 4876s01.dat 0 Author: Imre Papp (ipapp@geometria.hu) 0 Unofficial Element 0 KEYWORDS fabuland 0 BFC CERTIFY CCW 0 -- surface edges 2 24 26 -8 10 26 -8.39 17.72 2 24 26 -8.39 17.72 26 -9.47 25.38 2 24 26 -9.47 (...) (21 years ago, 29-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New part: 4876.dat - Fabuland Slide - 1 of 2 [DAT]
|
|
I've finished the development of this part. It was a bit difficult, especially to measure the curved surfaces and then the Excel acrobatics to generate their Ldraw counterpart. I think the result did worth the effort. I submit the part to part (...) (21 years ago, 29-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part building advice - too many triangles/quads?
|
|
(...) No, the back slash is correct. -Orion (21 years ago, 29-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Part building advice - too many triangles/quads?
|
|
(...) Shouldn't it be a forward slash (s/6898s01.dat)? Parts use forward slash in the actual part code (which is good, because it makes viewers in other operating systems slightly easier to make). --Travis (21 years ago, 29-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Part building advice - too many triangles/quads?
|
|
(...) Yes, of course - now where did I leave that backslash? Chris (21 years ago, 28-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Part building advice - too many triangles/quads?
|
|
(...) You can do it in LDAO as well, although there's no direct "round my decimals to 3 places" command. First, open your file in the editor. Second, go to Options | Decimals, and enter 3. Then put a line "0 SCALE 1" at the beginning of the block of (...) (21 years ago, 27-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
