 | | Re: Part building advice - too many triangles/quads?
|
|
Thanks everyone for the advice. After posting last night I went ahead and changed the hat puff to a 1/8 segment and called it s/6898s18.dat. Any conditional lines falling along the x, z, x+z (diagonal), or x-z axes were moved into the main file to (...) (20 years ago, 26-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Part building advice - too many triangles/quads?
|
|
(...) Great work. The subpart naming standard(s)n are documented at (URL) So, I'd rather your subpart were named s6898s01.dat. Submitting a new part to the Parts Tracker is easy. You need to register as an LDraw.org user (at (URL)) and then request (...) (20 years ago, 26-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Part building advice - too many triangles/quads?
|
|
(...) I'm guessing you mean s\6898s01.dat :) ROSCO (20 years ago, 26-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Part building advice - too many triangles/quads?
|
|
(...) Yes, of course - now where did I leave that backslash? Chris (20 years ago, 28-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Part building advice - too many triangles/quads?
|
|
(...) Shouldn't it be a forward slash (s/6898s01.dat)? Parts use forward slash in the actual part code (which is good, because it makes viewers in other operating systems slightly easier to make). --Travis (20 years ago, 29-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Part building advice - too many triangles/quads?
|
|
(...) No, the back slash is correct. -Orion (20 years ago, 29-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
