 | | Re: parts i'd like to see in Lcad/MLcad
|
|
(...) No, I got caught up in Org business. I can send you a mockup if you'd like. -Orion (22 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: parts i'd like to see in Lcad/MLcad
|
|
(...) Orion, Are these parts in a usable state yet? Thanks, Will (22 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
Getting there ... (URL) (22 years ago, 12-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 73037.dat
|
|
(...) Hi Leonardo, 103a, 103b and 103c are all in the original LDraw library, and haven't been changed since 1997. You'll have to grab a copy of ldraw027.exe/.zip to get them. Steve (22 years ago, 11-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part request: Cone 4 x 4 x 3 [DAT]
|
|
(...) I've got one of those from that set. Here's a hideous unofficial mock-up of the part. The inside has one big tube like the 4742 and a few ridges, but I didn't model them because I'm a lousy part maker. 0 Cone 4 x 4 x 3 0 Name: x483.dat 0 (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part request: Cone 4 x 4 x 3
|
|
Ooooh! Also me wanna :) I built this set some time ago and had to cheat a little.... (URL) (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Part request: Cone 4 x 4 x 3
|
|
(...) I made a dat file of that cone once. If only I knew where I stored it... /Tore (22 years ago, 6-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Part request: Cone 4 x 4 x 3
|
|
As I was building set 358 Rocket Base in MLCad I noticed that the Cone 4 x 4 x 3 ((URL) does not exist, not even on the PT. I also want to build trainset 725 in MLCad, which also uses this cone. As I don't own this part myself I can not create it. (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
Just a post to say I'm working on this. William (22 years ago, 6-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Patterns suck!
|
|
(...) IMHO a mosaic can't replace true vectors or poligons. regardless of the resolution you will still need an obcene amount of quads to define the shapes. it won't be the giant leap but it would be the small step if the LSC could with a new (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
