|
|
 | | Re: Help needed with cond. lines
|
| (...) I'm not sure the part authors will be able to help you, but my knowledge of LDView probably will. After looking at it in LDView (without actually trying to read your DAT code), I believe the problem is that you have a T-intersection, and the (...) (23 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Help needed with cond. lines [DAT]
|
| Could some of the senior-authors please have a look at the cond. lines? I'm in trouble with the section around the visor holes. I tried to add some cond. lines but LDView still doesn't show it with a smooth surface. I have no idea what's wrong. Many (...) (23 years ago, 23-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: New Primitive Class
|
| (...) I checked some geometry websites, and the consensus is that these are tori. Just not the common type. (...) Inverse-ratio torus is a better name, but is fairly lengthy. An inverted torus, I think, is still a torus, just with the surfaces (...) (23 years ago, 23-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: New Primitive Class
|
| (...) When Steve and I were working on the format for the torii, I believe we said we would deal with this issue when it arose. Now it has. (...) The spreadsheet I made to create p/16 and p/48 torii also included support for this occurance. (...) (23 years ago, 23-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: New Primitive Class
|
| (...) I'm not terribly surprised. This is a great solution, as then, if for some reason in the future, inverse ratio tori are needed, they can use the same convention, just a different starting letter and inverting the ratio as appropriate in the (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
