 | | Re: Slope 33 3 x 2 without face -Two different versions at the PT
|
|
(...) I have deleted s/3298s.dat Chris (23 years ago, 3-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Slope 33 3 x 2 without face -Two different versions at the PT
|
|
dear admins, there are two different versions of the "Slope Brick 33 3 x 2 without sloped face" at the PT: (URL) Tue Dec 17 21:02:03 2002, the file was initially submitted. Submitted by: mkennedy while the second one has two hold votes: (URL) Sat (...) (23 years ago, 2-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Head with Messy Ice Planet Hair Pattern
|
|
(...) liked to call him "The Ice Planet Kid". (...) I seem to remember that some early Divers sets had the Ice Planet head. 'Early' as in a few heads accidently got mixed in, or they were using up left-over supplies. I've never been able to (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Head with Messy Ice Planet Hair Pattern
|
|
(...) You may be right but I'd prefer a non-theme specific name -Orion (23 years ago, 23-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Head with Messy Ice Planet Hair Pattern
|
|
(...) That isn't the case, is it? I thought the Wild West head was the newer white hair guy, on the left here: (URL) the Ice Planet messy hair appeared since 1993? TWS Garrison (23 years ago, 23-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of springs parts
|
|
(...) The spring is actually a part (assuming LEGO assembles their own pneumatic elements). So it should have its own number. I've emailed you the details a few minutes ago. Steve (23 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Modelise inner details or use more standard primitives ?
|
|
(...) I think the way it exists now is best. How noticeable is it that the sphere has no holes in it. Even if the part is transparent, the fact the the holes do not pass through the sphere is barely noticeable. Plus since this part is small in size, (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Modelise inner details or use more standard primitives ?
|
|
(...) I think having the interior open would be a good thing for this part. However, we're rapidly approaching 1000 files backlogged on the Tracker. So I'm getting more willing to let stuff through that can be improved later. Steve (23 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Modelise inner details or use more standard primitives ?
|
|
(...) There was this unofficial generic rule that details smaller than 1 LDU may be omitted. I don't know if it is still valid. Another good rule, always valid, is common sense... :o) /Tore (23 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Modelise inner details or use more standard primitives ?
|
|
I have a problem with the part Technic Pneumatic T Piece (URL) have two options - modelling a very accurate part, with inner details, but for this would produce a part with less standard primitives cylinder or sphere. - using as many as possible (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
