 | | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
| [cross-posted and follow-up set to lugnet.cad.dev] (...) Hi! (...) There was extensive discussion about this issue, before the L-CAD mailing list moved to lugnet.cad.dev. The general thought was that stickers should be separate 'part files'. There (...) (25 years ago, 28-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Parts and Pattern
|
| Hallo ! Am 28.08.99 schrieb Steve Bliss: SB> There was extensive discussion about this issue, before the L-CAD SB> ... SB> the target piece, as shown in the set instructions. Nice. And had there been some result of the discussion? SB> I would *love* (...) (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
| (...) Yes. Sticker-files should be just the stickers, not stickers-stuck-on-parts. The numbers for the sticker files should use the ID number printed on the sticker sheet, but I don't remember if the long (7 digit?) or short (5 digit) number is (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
| Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:37cbd256.575508...net.com... (...) I thought the consensus was to do the stickers in 3D, maybe 2LDU thick. This would at least give a sticker a shot of being recognizable in LDraw, and (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
| (...) Was it? I couldn't remember. I've got an archive of most of the 'sticker discussion', but it's not on this machine. I'm sure I was a proponent of thick stickers. I reversed my position because LDraw objects are just shells, not solid 3D. But (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
