 | | Error in Technic axle extender? —Gary Williams
|
| | | The Technic axle extender (6538.dat) may have an error. If you view an axle extender from an end and rotate it so that an inserted cross-axle would look like a "plus" (+) sign, the physical part will have detents around the circumference at 0, 90, (...) (23 years ago, 26-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Error in Technic axle extender? —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) Yes. This has been discussed before. The original version of the part looks like the one in the library, while the new one is the way you describe. I have a few of the original axle extenders from 8857 Street Chopper. BTW, lugnet.cad.dat.parts (...) (23 years ago, 26-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Error in Technic axle extender? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) What was the resolution on this? Any hope of getting a version that matches the "new" one? Usually you can just fudge it by rotating 45 degrees anyway, but once in a while it matters. (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Error in Technic axle extender? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) That's the beauty of the Ldraw parts library (and open-source in general) - when it matters enough, it'll get done 8?) ROSCO (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Error in Technic axle extender? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) *ahem* All rotated and BFC'ed, here's the part you've all been waiting for: (URL) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
