 | | Re: New Part - 2527 Plate? 2 x 4 cannon base —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) Very nice job on these parts! I think I'd name the cannon parts as: 2527.DAT Minifig Cannon 2 x 4 Base x518.DAT Minifig Cannon 2 x n Non-Shooting Sorry, I don't have a cannon handy for measurement -- replace the 'n' with the proper length. (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New Part - 2527 Plate? 2 x 4 cannon base —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Is it necessary to specify a length 'n' if it's an accessory? That is, does the Minifig Tool Knife (whatever it's called specifically) mention a length? I'm just curious, but it seems that unless there's a length difference between shooting (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Part - 2527 Plate? 2 x 4 cannon base —Franklin W. Cain
|
| | | | | (...) Nope. Just call it "Minifig Cannon Non-Shooting" if you want. I've added *lots* of minifig weapons-of-individua...estruction to the inventory, and I didn't state the length of any of them... (Well, I *did* specify that the greatsword was (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Part - 2527 Plate? 2 x 4 cannon base —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Since both the base and the barrel are unique pieces, neither really needs the dimension. It's not like there's a different cannon base. :) But it doesn't hurt to include the dimensions, either. And it could be useful someday, if LEGO ever (...) (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Part - 2527 Plate? 2 x 4 cannon base —Paul Easter
|
| | | | (...) If it doesn't matter much to anyone, I will rename these parts as Steve stated a few messages back; 2527.DAT Minifig Cannon 2 x 4 Base x518.DAT Minifig Cannon 2 x 8 Non-Shooting ( I measured it, end to end) I will categorize both parts as (...) (24 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Part - 2527 Plate? 2 x 4 cannon base —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) "Roger, Roger!" (24 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
