 | | Re: Shutter, real ridges or simulated? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Yes indeed, I am very interested. Thanks for offering! I wonder, is the smaller shutter the same way? (...) I'd call it a dish too, I have no idea why it's named that way. I used it for a toilet bowl! ++Lar (24 years ago, 25-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Shutter, real ridges or simulated? —Kevin Bane
|
| | | | "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G4LGt1.Kou@lugnet.com... (...) Adam Howard has already done both of these. I have them in my "(Un-Official)" bin in my VEC. I think instead of actual louvers, he used half cylinders. (...) (24 years ago, 26-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Shutter, real ridges or simulated? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) an inverted U than a rotated C. But I'm just judging by appearance. Note that the part itself does not use triangular shaped ridges.. I thought it did but on examination, see that it does not. That makes a certain sense as it preserves (...) (24 years ago, 26-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Shutter, real ridges or simulated? —Tim Romine
|
| | | | (...) DOH! I had already made these shutters before I checked LUGNET, so here they are: 3856 in this post, 3582 in the next. As always, LMKWYT. Tim Romine AFOL for Life enimor@earthlink.net P.S. Toilet bowl, huh? Wow! I never would have thought of (...) (24 years ago, 26-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Shutter, real ridges or simulated? —Tim Romine
|
| | | | Here's my version of 3582: 0 Window 1 x 2 x 2 Shutter 0 WRITE Modified by Tim Romine 11/26/2000 0 ROTATION CENTER 0 0 0 1 "Custom" 0 ROTATION CONFIG 1 1 1 16 0 44 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2-4edge.dat 1 16 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2-4edge.dat 2 24 2 48 -4 (...) (24 years ago, 26-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
