Subject:
|
Re: Shutter, real ridges or simulated?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Sat, 25 Nov 2000 19:00:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
641 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Tim Romine writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > Are the ridges (louvers) on the (3856) shutter just lines rather than
> > triangular ridges/grooves?
> I just checked this part out on my PC and I'm afraid you're right. The
> grooves are only simulated with lines. Bummer! But not too difficult to
> fix, hee hee. Let me know if you're interested in a 3D grooved part, and
> I'll make one.
Yes indeed, I am very interested. Thanks for offering! I wonder, is the
smaller shutter the same way?
> On ONE condition: Tell me what you used the "1x1x2/3 cylinder" for! To me,
> it looks more like a dish, but to each his own... Anyway, I'm very curious!
I'd call it a dish too, I have no idea why it's named that way. I used it
for a toilet bowl!
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Shutter, real ridges or simulated?
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G4LGt1.Kou@lugnet.com... (...) Adam Howard has already done both of these. I have them in my "(Un-Official)" bin in my VEC. I think instead of actual louvers, he used half cylinders. (...) (24 years ago, 26-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Shutter, real ridges or simulated?
|
| (...) I just checked this part out on my PC and I'm afraid you're right. The grooves are only simulated with lines. Bummer! But not too difficult to fix, hee hee. Let me know if you're interested in a 3D grooved part, and I'll make one. On ONE (...) (24 years ago, 25-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
