 | | New Part - 30200 Windscreen 6 x 6 Octagonal Canopy Base Subpart 1 —Paul Easter
|
| | | Sub-part 1 of 2 0 sub-part for 30200.dat 0 Name: 30200s01.dat 0 Author: Paul Easter 0 Unofficial Sub-Part 0 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s/30200s02.dat 0 1 16 20 0 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4-4edge.dat 1 16 -20 4 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4-4edge.dat 1 16 20 (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New Part - 30200 Windscreen 6 x 6 Octagonal Canopy Base Subpart 1 —Tore Eriksson
|
| | | | (...) Pardon? Zerobase...? Is that something you use to orient the part? Never mind, it was REMmed out. (...) Paul Easter also wrote: (...) Why three files for one part? I see very little reason for not inlining 30200s01 into 30200 (else then (...) (24 years ago, 16-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Part - 30200 Windscreen 6 x 6 Octagonal Canopy Base Subpart 1 —Paul Easter
|
| | | | (...) uh hum... well, I try to remember to remove that line, but once in awhile I forget.. you caught me! take a look at my todo page for some info on this one. (URL) (...) ah...no, not different colors, and doubt they will be re-used. ok. after (...) (24 years ago, 16-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Part - 30200 Windscreen 6 x 6 Octagonal Canopy Base Subpart 1 —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) Keep in mind that for disk storage, the actual space taken is somewhat more than the actual filesize. For larger files, this extra space is insignificant. But for smaller files, the extra can really add up, depending on the exact situation. (...) (24 years ago, 16-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Excessive(?) use of Sub-parts (Was: New Part - 30200 Windscreen...) —Tore Eriksson
|
| | | | (...) I am just a little concerned about the rapidly increasing number of files we produce. It gets harder to overview. I know nothing about rendering program's cacheing and what effect usage of sub-files have. There has to be a balance, sub-parts (...) (24 years ago, 16-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Excessive(?) use of Sub-parts (Was: New Part - 30200 Windscreen...) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Oh, you're not going to be happy with the next update... (...) With a good caching strategy, subfiles should make a net improvement in performance. (...) For that part (<part:4186p01 the original soccer field baseplate>), a small grid of studs (...) (24 years ago, 16-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Excessive(?) use of Sub-parts (Was: New Part - 30200 Windscreen...) —Paul Easter
|
| | | | Well guys, it looks like I need to warm up the 'ol inliner... and off to the LDAO world I go. :-) Steve, is there still any room for more parts in the next update? (As single file parts) I think I still have a coulple I haven't sent yet. Paul (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Excessive(?) use of Sub-parts (Was: New Part - 30200 Windscreen...) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Well, until the voting page is up, I won't say absolutely not. But I've got a bit of a backlog now (after moving/kids to camp/week at the lake/etc.), and I am seriously trying to get to a point where I can post the voting page. So if I get a (...) (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Excessive(?) use of Sub-parts (Was: New Part - 30200 Windscreen...) —Paul Easter
|
| | | | (...) Ok, I very much understand. Been there this summer as well, except moving. (...) Sounds good! Let me(us) know if and how we can help. Paul (24 years ago, 18-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
