 | | Take a wish and I will possibly submit your part.
|
|
On the 1st of November I did a "quick build" (see (URL) and (URL) for reference). It was fun and I like to continue with this kind of authoring. I am open for (all) your wishes. First come, first served. (14 years ago, 17-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: bush lock primitives, 16 segment and inner edges.
|
|
(...) There's still the question of the interior edges though. Should they be removed or left as if? Also some of these could benefit from use of subparts, a common subpart for both 4273a and 4273b then another subpart to be used by 6577 and 4265a. (...) (14 years ago, 14-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: bush lock primitives, 16 segment and inner edges.
|
|
(...) I agree with what you have done to adjust bushloc2 and bushloc3 to fit 16-segment polygons: (URL) primtives is usually quite a challenge for the parts update process because all the affected parts need to be re-issued at the same time as the (...) (14 years ago, 8-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | bush lock primitives, 16 segment and inner edges.
|
|
The current bushloc primitives are divided into 32 segments where as most of the normal round type primitives are divided int 16 segments. Having noticed this I uploaded new versions of bushloc2 and bushloc3. Then I looked at some of the parts where (...) (14 years ago, 6-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: 6023.dat
|
|
(...) No worries. The good thing is that it has gotten me started on LDraw again, after some months in a state of Dark Ages Light. (...) Yes, so I noticed. Who knows, maybe the site admins have been experimenting on some improvements of the postig (...) (14 years ago, 3-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6023.dat
|
|
(...) Sorry, Tore :( It seems that Lugnet posts were stalled during several hours, preventing Nils message to reach you in time (hence also my double post...) Philo (14 years ago, 3-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6023.dat
|
|
(...) Oh. That's exactly what I've spent several of the latest hours doing. Zillions of triangles replaced, and some primitves in use. Same source, but into another file... :( /Tore (14 years ago, 2-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6023.dat
|
|
(...) I don't know if Nils can post here... anyway he did a good and fast job: (URL) (14 years ago, 2-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6023.dat
|
|
(...) Not sure Niels can post here... (URL) (14 years ago, 2-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6023.dat
|
|
(URL) (14 years ago, 2-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6023.dat [DAT]
|
|
(...) I'll finish the work on this part in the next two hours. Paul does not need to take this job ;-) Attachment: Concept half of 6023 (Inner side not modeled, primitive substitution and a run through rectifier necessary) 0 BFC CERTIFY CCW 1 16 27 (...) (14 years ago, 2-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6023.dat
|
|
(...) I have ordered a 6023 from a store at BrickLink. So hopefully I will recieve it by the end of this week and I'll have the weekend to LDraw it! :) /Tore (14 years ago, 2-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6023.dat
|
|
(...) I'll try to ask Paul Easter. But if you can try to make it, I would be very thankful. I would like to help but I don't have this part and my ldraw skills are (I think) not good enough to model a part from scratch in a reasonable amount of (...) (14 years ago, 2-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6023.dat
|
|
(...) Maybe you could ask Paul Easter? He was 90% done with it some seven years ago. (URL) else I think it is quite an easy part to redo from scratch. I don't think I have it, but if noone else is willing to take it on, and anyone has one to spare, (...) (14 years ago, 1-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 6023.dat
|
|
Hi there, I can't find the 6023 part anywhere (Minifig Jet-Pack). It a quite old part so I hope someone has already modeled it ! But where ? Does someone have an idea about it ? Thanks (14 years ago, 1-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Tore's Modulex parts in LDraw
|
|
(...) Yeah, that's exactly one of those things I had in mind. I don't know wxactly how they work and if this project would be in line with their terms of use, but that would maybe work? /Tore (14 years ago, 8-Oct-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Tore's Modulex parts in LDraw
|
|
(...) How about importing them into a free source-control hosting service like Google Code or GitHub? That way anyone can contribute and download quite easily, and there's very little setup and maintenance work for anyone to do. Allen (14 years ago, 8-Oct-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Tore's Modulex parts in LDraw
|
|
(...) That sounds like a challenge to me! (surely someone knows some way they interact :) ) If someone showed a way these interoperated would that make a different answer? I don't think LDraw should host clone parts, but these are actually made by (...) (14 years ago, 8-Oct-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Tore's Modulex parts in LDraw
|
|
(...) The Wiki can host the page put the upload has to be done somewhere else. You really won't try the uploader used for our CMS. A separate PT would obviously be a total different story or a new CMS. w. (14 years ago, 8-Oct-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Tore's Modulex parts in LDraw
|
|
(...) I think you are right. I wouldn't mind them being on the PT, but I will not work for it. However, I think there should be a permanent "official" or at least semi-official respority for them somewhere. Chris started out good, but I guess like (...) (14 years ago, 7-Oct-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
