In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Mark Kennedy wrote:
> The current bushloc primitives are divided into 32 segments where as most of the
> normal round type primitives are divided int 16 segments. Having noticed this I
> uploaded new versions of bushloc2 and bushloc3. Then I looked at some of the
> parts where the bushloc primitives get used and noticed some lines where the
> maybe shouldn't be.
> (see part 6577 at: http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/6577.dat)
> These extra lines can easily be fixed by removing the inner edges on the bush
> locks, but is this desirable or should the inner edges be left alone?
Fixing primtives is usually quite a challenge for the parts update process
because all the affected parts need to be re-issued at the same time as the
corrected primitive. However, in this case the dependency set is so small I
think we should do it:
(...) There's still the question of the interior edges though. Should they be removed or left as if? Also some of these could benefit from use of subparts, a common subpart for both 4273a and 4273b then another subpart to be used by 6577 and 4265a. (...) (14 years ago, 14-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
The current bushloc primitives are divided into 32 segments where as most of the normal round type primitives are divided int 16 segments. Having noticed this I uploaded new versions of bushloc2 and bushloc3. Then I looked at some of the parts where (...) (14 years ago, 6-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
